He also speaks up for diversity, not uniformity of the world as the goal, and for giving up trying to mould the world according to one narrow minded, exclusive worldview. It is only through a stark encounter with the death of the human spirit whether it be through totalitarian, capitalist, or bureaucratic means that mankind realizes that he must fight to retain that very spirit even in the face of his own physical death.
Camus discusses the philosophical motivations and problems of rebellion, including Nihilism to which he was strongly opposed and the challenge of creating something new out of the disorder and destruction that can be left behind. Perhaps it was the lack of faux-narrative.
The dialogues and conflicts between different revolutionaries make the different positions come alive. He grounds this politics in a wider "midday thought" which opposes love of this life, and an unrelativisable normative commitment to fellow human beings, against ideological promises of the other world, end of history, or triumph of an alleged master race.
Camus analyses the topic from a philosophical and historical viewpoint, and gives a perfect example for his thesis on revolution and th As long as mankind has told stories, the topic of rebellion has been central. Camus analyses the topic from a philosophical and historical viewpoint, and gives a perfect example for his thesis on revolution and the development of mankind by writing this long reflective essay, rebelling against the predominant ideas of his own Essay in man rebel revolt.
We also see the moral challenges that come with the violence implicit in rebellion, and the different ethical systems through which Rebels justify their actions.
Camus does at times appear like a schoolmaster lecturing the misguided left on the causes and outcomes of the Russian Revolution and it is no wonder he upset Sartre. It is not an easy read, definitely not something to skim through in a couple of hours.
He had already fallen out with Sartre and the French communists and so while he was extremely critical of German thinkers he also chose to be less than complimentary to some of the idols of the left wing. I was on surer ground here and found it easier to follow Camus, as in places he writes an almost revisionist history; this is especially true of the French Revolution where the left wing hero Saint-Just is cut down to size.
What is a rebel, he asks in the initial paragraph: That this is more of a comprehensive and in-depth work than we would normally expect from this author is not a criticism than can be levelled against this book fairly in its own terms though, but it explains why it is one of his less popular works.
Individuals like Ivan Kalyayev, who Camus brings up in his essay, and later uses as a character in his play The Just Assassins, I had never heard of.
There are some difficult ideas to grasp here and Philip Thody in his book [Albert Camus: It is a collection of essays that Camus worked up for publication in The history focuses primarily on the Russian and French rebellions and revolutionary movements, and assumes some knowlege of these.
The long third section titled Historical Rebellion takes up over half of the book and examines the French and Russian revolutions as well as the rise of the Nazis. I would rate this as 3. He looks at the world through the eyes and thoughts of the Marquis de Sade and Nietzsche attempting to show how they as intellectual rebels have challenged the prevailing thoughts, but have ended up in the trough of Nihilism.
He always claimed not to be a philosopher and he was right to say this because he rarely pauses to define his terms, he leaps from one thought to another and it is not always clear how he makes the jumps.
He explains the initiatives deriving from a sense of justice, and the consequences of absolute faith in the revolutionary cause, leading to its proverbial eating its own children and turning into its opposite, until a new revolution takes place.
Described by Camus as " absurd ," this latter perception must be examined with what Camus terms "lucidity. Therefore, this sensibility is logically a "point of departure" that irresistibly "exceeds itself. Too frequently, the ordinary English reader feels like a stranger in the midst of a complicated family quarrel.
Writing at a time when collectivist ideology was en vogue, especially in France dominated by Sartre, he makes a claim for a reevaluation of revolutionary developments focusing on individuals and their choices and responsibilities.
He arranged them into five sections and his aim was to make them into a definitive statements on his thinking on Europe as it emerged from yet another catastrophic world war.
This culminated in the "temporary" enslaving of people in the name of their future liberation. When reading The Rebel Camus position on the intellectual left should always be born in mind.
The short first section defines what Camus means by an act of rebellion and goes on to examine what value judgements need to be present. Camus slowly guides the reader through the various causes and effects of religious, historical and political revolts and revolutions, as well as artistic revolutions in modern society.
What we have here is an historical and philosophical treatment of the concept of the Rebel and of Rebellion. Camus point in rewriting the history of the revolutions of the past is to demonstrate that any revolt that does not recognise that it should transcend nihilism and establish limits of some kind is doomed to justify murder, terror and dictatorship.
One repressive regime is followed by another equally repressive; or worse. Such revolutionaries aimed to kill God.((The Rebel: An Essay on Man in Revolt) Bound together by a shared struggle within an absurd condition, Camus envisioned a community rising up and rebelling against the evils and injustices of the world.
The Rebel (French: L'Homme révolté) is a book-length essay by Albert Camus, which treats both the metaphysical and the historical development of rebellion and revolution in Author: Albert Camus. The Rebel: An Essay on Man in Revolt by Albert Camus By one of the most profoundly influential thinkers of our century, The Rebel is a classic essay on revolution/5(7).
L'Homme révolté = The Rebel, Albert Camus The Rebel (French: L'Homme révolté) is a book-length essay by Albert Camus, which treats both the metaphysical and the historical development of rebellion and revolution in societies, especially Western Europe/5.
By one of the most profoundly influential thinkers of our century, The Rebel is a classic essay on revolution. For Albert Camus, the urge to revolt is one of the essential dimensions of human nature, manifested in mans timeless Promethean struggle against the conditions of his existence, as well as the popular uprisings against established orders throughout history.
Get this from a library! The rebel: an essay on man in revolt. [Albert Camus] -- By one of the most profoundly influential thinkers of our century, The Rebel is a classic essay on revolution. For Albert Camus, the urge to revolt is one of the "essential dimensions" of human.Download